2012 Holden Epica Turbo Diesel vs. 2012 Holden Epica 2.5
To start off, both 2012 Holden Epica Turbo Diesel and 2012 Holden Epica 2.5 were released in the same year (2012). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica 2.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica 2.5 (153 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica Turbo Diesel. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica 2.5 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica Turbo Diesel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica Turbo Diesel (320 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica 2.5. (237 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica Turbo Diesel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica 2.5.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Holden Epica Turbo Diesel | 2012 Holden Epica 2.5 | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Epica | Epica |
Year Released | 2012 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4805 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |