2012 Mazda CX-7 vs. 1996 Holden Nova

To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden Nova would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-7 (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1996 Holden Nova. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1996 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-7 weights approximately 521 kg more than 1996 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-7 (218 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Holden Nova. (135 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Holden Nova.

Compare all specifications:

2012 Mazda CX-7 1996 Holden Nova
Make Mazda Holden
Model CX-7 Nova
Year Released 2012 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2500 cc 1586 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 161 HP 105 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 218 Nm 135 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1586 kg 1065 kg
Vehicle Length 4681 mm 4100 mm
Vehicle Width 1872 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1646 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2751 mm 2470 mm