2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV vs. 2013 Volkswagen Beetle
To start off, 2013 Volkswagen Beetle is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volkswagen Beetle weights approximately 190 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen Beetle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | 2013 Volkswagen Beetle | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volkswagen |
| Model | i-MiEV | Beetle |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Single Speed | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3678 mm | 4277 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1585 mm | 1808 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1615 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2537 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 2.4 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 1.9 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
