2012 Mitsubishi Lancer ES CVT vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback ES CVT
To start off, both 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer ES CVT and 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback ES CVT were released in the same year (2012). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. Both 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer ES CVT and 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback ES CVT are equipped with a 2,000 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer ES CVT (198 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback ES CVT. (196 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer ES CVT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback ES CVT.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Mitsubishi Lancer ES CVT | 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback ES CVT | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi |
Model | Lancer | Lancer |
Year Released | 2012 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 196 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | CVT | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4572 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1763 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1491 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2634 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.1 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 59 L |