2012 Nissan Leaf vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Ranger would be higher.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Leaf. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Nissan Leaf | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Leaf | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Single Speed | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4445 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1549 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3010 mm |
