2012 Nissan Leaf vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Nissan Leaf. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Nissan Leaf would be higher.
Because 2013 Toyota 4Runner is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Toyota 4Runner. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Nissan Leaf | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Leaf | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Single Speed | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4445 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1549 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 2.6 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 2.2 L/100km | 12.6 L/100km |
