2012 Nissan NV vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Nissan NV is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Nissan NV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan NV (317 HP) has 208 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan NV should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2012 Nissan NV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Nissan NV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Nissan NV has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2009 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Nissan NV will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Nissan NV | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | NV | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5600 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | 5-speed automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 6111 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2029 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2156 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3711 mm | 2490 mm |
