2012 Subaru Impreza vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Subaru Impreza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Subaru Impreza would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Subaru Impreza is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Subaru Impreza weights approximately 130 kg more than 2013 Toyota Matrix.
Because 2012 Subaru Impreza is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Impreza will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Subaru Impreza | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Subaru | Toyota |
| Model | Impreza | Matrix |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 130 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | AWD | Front |
| Transmission Type | CVT | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1285 kg |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.5 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.7 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |
