2012 Volkswagen Sharan vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Sharan is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Volvo C30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Volvo C30 would be higher. At 2,000 cc, 2012 Volkswagen Sharan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volkswagen Sharan weights approximately 343 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Volkswagen Sharan | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
Model | Sharan | C30 |
Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1794 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4854 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1904 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2919 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 5 L/100km | 3.8 L/100km |