2013 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, both 2013 Jeep Wrangler and 2013 Mini Countryman were released in the same year (2013). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 489 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Countryman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2013 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Jeep | Mini |
Model | Wrangler | Countryman |
Year Released | 2013 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 281 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1874 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4161 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1872 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1839 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2423 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.3 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.7 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 47 L |