2013 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4MATIC Wagon vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG Wagon
To start off, both 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4MATIC Wagon and 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG Wagon were released in the same year (2013). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG Wagon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG Wagon (511 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4MATIC Wagon. (298 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG Wagon should accelerate faster than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4MATIC Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG Wagon weights approximately 20 kg more than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4MATIC Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4MATIC Wagon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG Wagon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4MATIC Wagon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG Wagon (700 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4MATIC Wagon. (370 Nm @ 5250 RPM). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG Wagon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4MATIC Wagon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4MATIC Wagon | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG Wagon | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | E | E |
| Year Released | 2013 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | dual-disk rotary |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 298 HP | 511 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 370 Nm | 700 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 98 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.1 seconds | 4.4 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 1945 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4895 mm | 4913 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2071 mm | 2100 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1517 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2874 mm | 2874 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.3 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
