1939 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1939 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 6C | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1939 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2490 mm |