1939 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 69 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 268 more horse power than 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2008 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
| Model | 6C | UTE |
| Year Released | 1939 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2442 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 357 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
