1939 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 73 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1939 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | 6C | Cruze |
Year Released | 1939 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2685 mm |