1940 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2011 Mazda 2
To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 71 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 2 (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 400 kg more than 2011 Mazda 2.
Because 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1940 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2011 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 6C | 2 |
Year Released | 1940 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2489 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 43 L |