1941 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 71 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 148 more horse power than 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
| Model | 6C | XF |
| Year Released | 1941 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2442 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 237 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 70 L |
