1941 Buick 40 vs. 1969 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Calais is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Buick 40 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1941 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1941 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 510 kg more than 1941 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Buick 40 | 1969 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | 40 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1941 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 2100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3300 mm |
