1941 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1941 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1941 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Buick 40 weights approximately 382 kg more than 2000 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Buick 40 | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1941 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2580 mm |