1941 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (263 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1941 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1941 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 45 kg more than 1941 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1941 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Buick 40 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | 40 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1941 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 3599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 263 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1635 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2890 mm |
