1941 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 69 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Buick 40 (114 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2010 Ford C-Max. (113 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1941 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Buick 40 weights approximately 215 kg more than 2010 Ford C-Max. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1941 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford C-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Buick 40 | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1941 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1375 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2648 mm |