1941 Cadillac 60 vs. 1954 Mercedes-Benz 180
To start off, 1954 Mercedes-Benz 180 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1954 Mercedes-Benz 180. (45 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1954 Mercedes-Benz 180. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 534 kg more than 1954 Mercedes-Benz 180. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 60 | 1954 Mercedes-Benz 180 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 60 | 180 |
| Year Released | 1941 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5672 cc | 1767 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 45 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1824 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2660 mm |
