1941 Cadillac 60 vs. 1966 DKW Munga
To start off, 1966 DKW Munga is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 714 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1941 Cadillac 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 60 | 1966 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Cadillac | DKW |
| Model | 60 | Munga |
| Year Released | 1941 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5672 cc | 978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1824 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2010 mm |
