1941 Cadillac 60 vs. 1979 Renault Siete
To start off, 1979 Renault Siete is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1979 Renault Siete. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1979 Renault Siete. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 1009 kg more than 1979 Renault Siete. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1941 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Renault Siete, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 60 | 1979 Renault Siete | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | 60 | Siete |
| Year Released | 1941 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5672 cc | 1036 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1824 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2540 mm |
