1941 Cadillac 60 vs. 1996 Volvo 960
To start off, 1996 Volvo 960 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volvo 960 (168 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volvo 960 should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 324 kg more than 1996 Volvo 960.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Cadillac 60 | 1996 Volvo 960 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 60 | 960 |
Year Released | 1941 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5672 cc | 2472 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1824 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2780 mm |