1941 Cadillac 60 vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 561 kg more than 1941 Cadillac 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 60 | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 60 | Econoline |
| Year Released | 1941 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5672 cc | 5407 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1824 kg | 2385 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 3510 mm |
