1941 Cadillac 60 vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1941 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Cadillac 60 | 2000 Holden HRT | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 60 | HRT |
Year Released | 1941 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5672 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |