1941 Cadillac 60 vs. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero
To start off, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 60 (148 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. (140 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 456 kg more than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1941 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Cadillac 60 | 2004 Oldsmobile Alero | |
Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
Model | 60 | Alero |
Year Released | 1941 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5672 cc | 2196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 140 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1824 kg | 1368 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2720 mm |