1941 Cadillac 60 vs. 2005 Kia Optima
To start off, 2005 Kia Optima is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Optima (170 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 337 kg more than 2005 Kia Optima.
Because 1941 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Cadillac 60 | 2005 Kia Optima | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | 60 | Optima |
Year Released | 1941 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5672 cc | 2671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1824 kg | 1487 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2710 mm |