1941 Cadillac 60 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 60.
Because 1941 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 60 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 60 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1941 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5672 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2650 mm |
