1941 Cadillac 60 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (139 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 690 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Cadillac 60 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 60 | 3 |
Year Released | 1941 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5672 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1824 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2650 mm |