1941 Cadillac 60 vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 60.
Because 1941 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda 5 has automatic transmission and 1941 Cadillac 60 has manual transmission. 1941 Cadillac 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Cadillac 60 | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 60 | 5 |
Year Released | 1941 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5672 cc | 2258 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2760 mm |