1941 Cadillac 60 vs. 2010 Alfa Romeo GT
To start off, 2010 Alfa Romeo GT is newer by 69 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Alfa Romeo GT (237 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Alfa Romeo GT should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 339 kg more than 2010 Alfa Romeo GT.
Because 1941 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Alfa Romeo GT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 60 | 2010 Alfa Romeo GT | |
| Make | Cadillac | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | 60 | GT |
| Year Released | 1941 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5672 cc | 3179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 237 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1824 kg | 1485 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2600 mm |
