1941 Cadillac 60 vs. 2010 BMW 120
To start off, 2010 BMW 120 is newer by 69 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 120 (155 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 120 should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 439 kg more than 2010 BMW 120.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 BMW 120 has automatic transmission and 1941 Cadillac 60 has manual transmission. 1941 Cadillac 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 BMW 120 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Cadillac 60 | 2010 BMW 120 | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | 60 | 120 |
Year Released | 1941 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5672 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1824 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2670 mm |