1941 Cadillac 60 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 71 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 408 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 91 kg more than 1941 Cadillac 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 60 | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | 60 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1941 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5672 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 556 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1824 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1842 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2880 mm |
