1941 Cadillac 60 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 71 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 1941 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1941 Cadillac 60 has manual transmission. 1941 Cadillac 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Cadillac 60 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 60 | Epica |
Year Released | 1941 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5672 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5450 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2700 mm |