1941 Cadillac 61 vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1966 Lotus Elan is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 61. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 61 would be higher. At 5,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 61 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 61 (124 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 61 should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 61 weights approximately 1204 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Cadillac 61 | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | 61 | Elan |
Year Released | 1941 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5276 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 696 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2240 mm |