1941 Cadillac 61 vs. 1996 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1996 Ford Taurus is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 61. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 61 would be higher. At 5,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 61 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Taurus (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 61. (124 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 61. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 61 weights approximately 382 kg more than 1996 Ford Taurus.
Because 1941 Cadillac 61 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 61. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 61 | 1996 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 61 | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1941 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5276 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1518 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2760 mm |
