1941 Cadillac 61 vs. 2002 Proton Tiara
To start off, 2002 Proton Tiara is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 61. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 61 would be higher. At 5,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 61 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 61 (124 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2002 Proton Tiara. (59 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 61 should accelerate faster than 2002 Proton Tiara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 61 weights approximately 1120 kg more than 2002 Proton Tiara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1941 Cadillac 61 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 61. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Proton Tiara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 61 | 2002 Proton Tiara | |
| Make | Cadillac | Proton |
| Model | 61 | Tiara |
| Year Released | 1941 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5276 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 780 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2290 mm |
