1941 Cadillac 61 vs. 2003 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2003 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 61. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 61 would be higher. At 5,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 61 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota 4Runner (242 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 61. (124 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 61.
Because 2003 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1941 Cadillac 61. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1941 Cadillac 61 has manual transmission. 1941 Cadillac 61 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Cadillac 61 | 2003 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 61 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1941 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5276 cc | 3995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1900 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2800 mm |