1941 Cadillac 61 vs. 2009 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2009 Fiat Bravo is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 61. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 61 would be higher. At 5,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 61 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 61 (124 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2009 Fiat Bravo. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 61 should accelerate faster than 2009 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 61 weights approximately 465 kg more than 2009 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1941 Cadillac 61 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 61. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Cadillac 61 | 2009 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | 61 | Bravo |
Year Released | 1941 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5276 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1435 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2610 mm |