1941 Cadillac 62 vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 62 | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 62 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1941 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 5736 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2960 mm |
