1941 Cadillac 62 vs. 1978 Zastava 750
To start off, 1978 Zastava 750 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 62 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 750. (30 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1148 kg more than 1978 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 62 | 1978 Zastava 750 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | 62 | 750 |
| Year Released | 1941 | 1978 |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 767 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 30 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 642 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2010 mm |
