1941 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 62 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 582 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | TS-50 |
Year Released | 1941 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5676 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2760 mm |