1941 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2000 Mazda AZ is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1040 kg more than 2000 Mazda AZ.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1941 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | AZ |
Year Released | 1941 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5676 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2370 mm |