1941 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis (208 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 62. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 42 kg more than 1941 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
| Model | 62 | Grand Marquis |
| Year Released | 1941 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 4604 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1832 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2760 mm |
