1941 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Opel Astra
To start off, 2000 Opel Astra is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Astra (190 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 62. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Astra should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 415 kg more than 2000 Opel Astra.
Because 1941 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Opel Astra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Opel |
| Model | 62 | Astra |
| Year Released | 1941 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2620 mm |
