1941 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 250 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | 62 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1941 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 5698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2560 mm |
