1941 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Impala (180 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 62. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 212 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 1941 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Chevrolet Impala | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | 62 | Impala |
| Year Released | 1941 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 3350 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1578 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3030 mm |
