1941 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 MG TF
To start off, 2002 MG TF is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 62 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2002 MG TF. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 670 kg more than 2002 MG TF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1941 Cadillac 62 | 2002 MG TF | |
Make | Cadillac | MG |
Model | 62 | TF |
Year Released | 1941 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5676 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2380 mm |