1941 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 62. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 130 kg more than 1941 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1941 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1941 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2830 mm |
